But I'd say that most of Odyssey was more like a virtual "Easter Egg Hunt" than typical 3D Mario gameplay. Thus, IMO, Galaxy 2 basically perfected 3D Mario level design and had a massive amount of unique levels (I think just shy of 50 Galaxies, many of which dramatically changed form between stars, producing something like 80+ unique levels). But there really weren't that many of these type of linear platforming segments in Odyssey.
My favorite parts of Odyssey were the "missions" when you first entered new kingdoms, which had linear platforming sections and boss fights, very similar to most stars in Galaxy 2. I think Galaxy 2 struck a perfect balance between having fully 3D worlds with some small branching paths to explore and stellar linear level design. I really hope we get one.Īll fantastic games. I think that an Odyssey sequel, akin to what Galaxy 2 did to the Galaxy formula, would take the gameplay ideas even further and push the boundaries of what Mario is capable of on the Switch. I think Galaxy is more fun overall, but Odyssey is more rewarding in every other aspect. I want to be biased and say I loved it more than G2, but it's likely just bias from playing it recently. I think it would land in the same area as Galaxy 2 for me, but I need to replay Galaxy 2. I'm still trudging through the post game, but I adored this game. It nailed the small open world platforming aspect in a way that hasn't been done in a long time.
I need to play it again to decide if I enjoy it more than Odyssey. Sure, it was really linear and some folks didn't like that, but it did linear REALLY well. It took the first game and really ran with the idea. I'd probably rank it right ahead of Sunshine. They could have taken a lot of ideas further than they did. Galaxy 1 was a great breath of fresh air, but it wasn't perfect. And the camera movement is the worst of any game in the main series. Personally, I think some of the level design is lacking compared to other entries. It added some more personality to the Mario world. Sunshine took the base of 64 and did something really unique with it. It's hard to say because it's been 20 years since I played 64 for the first time. But Odyssey and Galaxy 2 might have been more fun for me. In terms of legacy, level design, and personal attachment, it's #1 for me. This game will always be #1 in my heart, but I don't know if it's truly my favorite to play. However, it barely detracts from the game at all. But it does show it's age a bit in some areas, admittedly. I love all of them for different reasons.Ħ4 was my first real game. If there is a single Mario game in need of a complete overhaul and remaster, it would be this one.īut hey, if you're enjoying it, that's all that really matters, right? Though I'd be interested in your thoughts when you get to the later areas like Noki Bay and Pinata Village.This is almost too hard to answer. I don't *hate* it, but there's a reason this is the first time I've replayed it since the original Cube release, unlike 64 and Galaxy, which I've played through several times before. The game was originally rushed, and it shows.
SUPER MARIO SUNSHINE 64 REDDIT HOW TO
Not to mention it suffers a lot from "Where the hell do I go" syndrome, where much of the time I'm left wondering what exactly the object of the level is and how to accomplish it. I dunno, unlike 64 or Galaxy, I found myself always having trouble judging my jumps, often either falling short or completely overshooting, which often meant spending another five minutes retracing my steps back to where I was. I'd slightly press the control stick forward and that Italian bastard will flip around all over the place until he falls into a bottomless pit. I finished Sunshine earlier this evening (ie, defeated Bowser), and while I enjoyed parts of it, I found the experience overall frustrating, mainly due to how skittery Mario controls compared to, well, every other 3D game.
0 kommentar(er)
